The following are brief excerpts from conversations I've had on true psychology / my psychologist:
Pirula: Ah, you're going to a psychologist?
Mati: Yes
Pirula: And what power is?
That is the cult of non-information. Why should I ask my current psychologist what next? What adds value to know that your psychologist is Freudian, Lacanian or Peronist? Say ... I can be hungry curiosity and wonder ... but is that: curiosity. As if you like raisins or not.
Fulanita: And your psychologist speaks enough or is silent throughout the session?
Mati: No, I do not know ... talk, talk ...
Fulanita: Ah, then it is Lacanian.
Sure, sure it's as simple as that, right? Jacques Lacan sure got up one day and said "Ahh! We have to speak during the session "and there you have. And there were plenty of pibitos who said" ahh! this weakness should be right. "Here are the Lacanian.
Firulafia: Mati, you you can ask your psychologist if you can recommend one for me?
Mati: Yeah, go ahead.
Firulafia: Tell her I'm looking for a psychologist for a brief and shock therapy.
turns out that one was read "Freud for Dummies" on the internet and you know what the therapeutic approach you need.
The problem is people who read a little about psychology. People tend to think that after having done the psychology CBC or seeing a movie about Piaget and are enabled to say, diagnose, evaluate and decide on psychological aspects. What jerks psychologists, no? Lost years of college when they could have had a coffee with one already received and is almost the same.
I think that once a person studied a little bit of psychology is that requiring it to do and finish the race. Or you do not know anything, or know enough. Wow.
is just my humble opinion.
But to be against a defense mechanism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment